Wednesday 14th of July 2004

« « Keep Holding Those Horses!| This Working Life » »

OK, Let The Horses Go For A Run, But Don’t Let Them Out Of The Paddock

A , posted by Anthony in the early evening.

Oekaki

OK, so I’m starting tomorrow – but only for a few days. But possibly leading to more.

Or not.

But that’s OK. It’s definitely enough for me to delay departure for another month and see how this develops.

In other news, I saw King Arthur. My review is imminent. In a nutshell, it’s pretty crappy.

Comments on "OK, Let The Horses Go For A Run, But Don’t Let Them Out Of The Paddock"

  1. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1590

    At 10:51 pm on Wednesday 14th of July 2004, Ivan testified

    yeah, thats what im talking about, now go pick up a prostitute, beat her and take her money. Make sure you get your jollies first.

  2. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1592

    At 8:16 am on Friday 16th of July 2004, Anthony asserted

    Just to be clear – Ivan is talking about the game, people.

  3. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1593

    At 6:54 pm on Friday 16th of July 2004, Crack Jr announced

    Time is running out! Subsribe to Anthony’s STUNNING FIDUCIARY SCHEME and reap STERLING FINANCIAL MOSS. You’d be stupid NOT to do this.

  4. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1594

    At 10:10 pm on Friday 16th of July 2004, Babs asserted

    The movie was crappy or the review will be crappy?? Specify!!

    I pray the neph doesn’t read said review, as if one harsh word is said about Keira Knightly, he MAY go slightly mental.

  5. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1595

    At 2:14 am on Saturday 17th of July 2004, Anthony realised it was important that we all should understand

    The movie is crappy. The review isn’t crappy yet.

  6. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1596

    At 2:20 pm on Saturday 17th of July 2004, Ivan felt the urge to write

    I need an update, its saturday, c’mon finger out time

  7. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1597

    At 2:26 pm on Saturday 17th of July 2004, Ivan blurted

    ok, at least you reviewed King Arthur, is shit?

    Big Surprise.

    Bruckheimer’s Simpson fueled honeymoon is finally over

  8. Gravatar

    Comment ID: 1604

    At 5:10 pm on Tuesday 20th of July 2004, Jim Rickard discoursed

    I hope that the film doesn’t get its facts wrong or contain any historical inaccuaracies! Can the sequel be called ‘king Arthur 2, love on the rocks’?

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: