Saturday 29th 2005f January 2005
« « Yet Another Redesign| Th. . . Th. . . Thir. . . » »A Return to Classicism
A whole new look! My God! Where did that come from!
I haven’t finished styling the sidebar, or the links along the top, or the banner, or Ask Anthony. And I’ll probably change the graphic at the far right. And I’ll probably change the background colour. And I’ll probably add boxes around the comments, or something. And I haven’t figured out where to put the guestbook link. But other than that, it’s basically done.
Is everything working?


Comment ID: 2338
At 8:47 pm on Saturday 29th 2005f January 2005, Babs typedRather nifty, so far.
Though ‘After the Party’ hasn’t been updated in yonks.
Not that I didn’t know that already.
cough
Swear it.
Comment ID: 2339
At 10:06 pm on Saturday 29th 2005f January 2005, daragh declaredgimmie photos, pictures, something to look at
Comment ID: 2341
At 8:54 pm on Sunday 30th 2005f January 2005, Douglas Murray felt the urge to writestill loads slowly, even though it is less graphically busy
Comment ID: 2342
At 5:54 am on Monday 31st 2005f January 2005, peter assertedLooks great
Comment ID: 2343
At 10:20 am on Monday 31st 2005f January 2005, Anthony postedI’m about done, now. Maybe a few minor tweaks. Anybody have any complaints? Any usability or navigation issues? Anything difficult to read? I still haven’t come up with something I like for the far right – those little holes just aren’t doing it for me. Suggestions appreciated.
Doug – there’s a lot more text per page than before, but I think the delays are caused by the external sites that are called: BlogSnob and SiteScore. Sometimes they’re working ok, but others they become a bottleneck. At least they’re about the last things to load, so the content is all there.
Comment ID: 2344
At 12:13 pm on Monday 31st 2005f January 2005, D professedAn improvement, certainly. A great improvement, perhaps. A moment of nostalgia for the blatant virtuosity, maybe. I suppose that as a celt you cannot resist unnecessary ornamentation. Still, it is not as bad as the Book of Kells